Informassive
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s REAL reason for vicious attack on Queen Elizabeth II
Home » Entertainment » Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s REAL reason for vicious attack on Queen Elizabeth II

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s REAL reason for vicious attack on Queen Elizabeth II


Prince Harry, 35, andMeghan Markle, 38, have sparked heated criticism in the UK over the couple’s “pointed” tone in their announcement they’re going to no longer expend the brand Sussex Royal from Spring 2020. But commentator Jane Moore believes the statement wasn’t aimed atQueen Elizabeth IIhowever also had a heartbreaking link toPrincess Diana. Ms Moore explained it’s aimed at the “men in grey suits”.

Speaking on ITV’s Unfastened Girls folk, Ms Moore said: “They’ve employed a stout showbiz publicist so clearly they achieve want to be in the papers or in the media.

“Harry’s mum, Diana, always ancient to talk about the grey men of the Palace and for distinct, there are folks in the Palace who have worked there for years and think a certain way and they’re always briefing behind the scenes.

“I think this statement is aimed extra at them from Harry than it’s actually at his grandmother.

“I think he actually adores his grandmother.

READ MORE: Royal snub: Meghan Markle gained’t return to UK with Harry

Prince Harry Meghan Markle

Prince Harry, 35, and Meghan Markle, 38, have sparked heated criticism in the UK(Image: GETTY )

PRINCE HARRY and Meghan Markle

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle announcement they’re going to no longer expend the brand Sussex Royal(Image: GETTY)

“But folks have made that leap thinking it’s critical of the Queen however it certainly isn’t, it’s about the Monarchy.”

She went on to say she understands why their trademark has to change due to them getting involved with commercial activities.

It comes after the Queen said they may now not work beneath the name “Sussex Royal” after stepping down as senior participants of the Royal Family.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have confirmed they may now not be using the trademark.

Queen Elizabeth II news

Queen Elizabeth II said they couldn’t expend ‘Sussex Royal’(Image: GETTY )

In their statement, Meghan and Harry said: “Whereas there is precedent for assorted titled participants of the Royal Family to see employment exterior of the institution, for The Duke and Duchess of Sussex, a 12-month review length has been put in place.

“Whereas there is now not any jurisdiction by The Monarchy or Cabinet Administrative middle over the expend of the note ‘Royal’ overseas, The Duke and Duchess of Sussex achieve now not intend to expend ‘Sussex Royal’ or any iteration of the note ‘Royal’ in any territory (both within the UK or in any other case) when the transition happens Spring 2020.”

The royals appeared to be remarking as soon as again they don’t fully agree with the phrases of the agreement seeing them fully stepping back from royal duties.

The statement read: “The preference of The Duke and Duchess of Sussex was to continue to announce and give a increase to Her Majesty The Queen albeit in a extra restricted capacity, whereas now not drawing on the Sovereign Grant.”

DON’T MISS

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle to ‘rejoin’ royals as Queen determined [VIDEO]
Melania Trump: FLOTUS to share heartbreaking bond with Princess Diana  [INSIGHT]
Prince Philip health update: Queen fears for Duke’s ‘downhearted health’ [VIDEO]

Royal Family tree

Royal Family tree(Image: EXPRESS)

It added: “Per the agreement, The Duke and Duchess of Sussex understand that they are required to step back from Royal duties and now not undertake representative duties on behalf of Her Majesty The Queen.”

Prince Harry had already voiced his discontent at the Queen’s ruling on this challenge during a heartfelt speech delivered at a charity match for his organisation, Sentebale, in late January.

He said: “What I want to make clear is we’re now not walking away, and we certainly aren’t walking away from you.

“Our hope was to continue serving the Queen, the commonwealth, and my military associations, however with out public funding.”

Add comment

Informassive