Twitter’s web redesign isn’t as accessible as it should be, experts say

After teasing its original font in January, Twitter made some major changes to its website and app design this week. Nonetheless while Twitter framed these updates as making the platform “more accessible,” some accessibility experts say that these changes ignored the mark.

Most noticeably, tweets now appear in “Chirp,” Twitter’s proprietary typeface, and the display has distinguished more visual contrast between the background and textual whisper material. Diversified updates made the interface much less cluttered, removing unnecessary divider lines. For of us with low imaginative and prescient, excessive-contrast design can make websites more legible, nonetheless the latest contrast level is so excessive that it’s causing strain for some customers. Twitter far exceeds the minimum contrast standards scheme by the Web State Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), which offers recommendations for making websites accessible to disabled folks. Nonetheless web accessibility isn’t one-measurement fits all — while some customers may need a excessive-contrast display, others who bear from chronic migraines may require a more muted trip. Research has also proven that dyslexic folks have a tendency to read faster when equipped with decrease-contrast textual whisper material.

“When the update hit, I may immediately feel pain in my eyes, and within about half an hour, I was having a rigidity headache,” said Alex Haagaard, a design researcher and founding member at The Disabled Checklist. “I have a lot of chronic pain, and I cannot deliberately present myself to something that is going to be exacerbating my levels of pain, because then that has cascade effects.”

Up except last year, Twitter’s accessibility team was volunteer-based — paid staff at Twitter would take on accessibility tasks on top of their existing jobs, TechCrunch reported. In September, a few months after Twitter had released an audio tweet feature without accessibility considerations, Twitter introduced two dedicated accessibility teams within its company. Nonetheless experts emphasize that including disabled folks in design choices from the get-shuffle is necessary when implementing original features.

“They talked a suitable talk about how they have been going to change this, that they have been going to integrate accessibility and disabled perspectives more into their design processes, and from this, it seems they have no longer performed an adequate job with that,” said Haagaard. “Engaging folks from disabled communities as consultants at the excessive-level stages, within the research and conceptualization phase, would prevent designers from getting to a point the place you’re testing something and you realize it’s fundamentally problematic and it’s too late.”

Twitter told TechCrunch that “feedback was sought from folks with disabilities in the course of the job, from the beginning. On the opposite hand, folks have diversified preferences and needs and we are able to continue to track feedback and refine the trip. We realize lets get more feedback in the future and we’ll work to achieve that.”

We are seeing some display bugs, so should you advance across these please send us a screenshot. It will back us troubleshoot the points.

Also, should you continue to trip painful come across strain or headaches/migraines because of the font, please check-in with us again.

— Twitter Accessibility (@TwitterA11y) August 12, 2021

On its accessibility account Twitter, acknowledged the issues that customers have been reporting with come across-strain and migraines after the update. This afternoon, the platform added that due to person feedback, it is making contrast changes on all buttons to make them “easier on the eyes.”

“When a design organization makes an announcement, and the accessibility organization alongside it actually has things to say about it, that means they work together, and that’s always a suitable thing,” said Matt May, head of Inclusive Design at Adobe. “The foremost thing is to continue to hear and find the these that aren’t being represented, and attempt to synthesize them within the remaining of the gadget.”

May points out that an update this ostentatious will inevitably yield more pushback, nonetheless behind the scenes, the app is, he said, “doing important accessibility work that usually slides below the radar.” For example, Twitter lately enabled customers to upload SRT files to videos, which adds captions. Plus, Twitter Spaces has enhance for live captioning, while competitors adore Clubhouse unexcited don’t supply this basic accessibility feature.

It’s peculiar that Twitter skipped over to add customization capabilities when it rolled out its higher-contrast display and original default typeface, since the company has a history of offering customization in diversified places in its person trip. At present, customers can toggle among dark, light and black modes, make their default font measurement greater or smaller, and even change the gawk of buttons and hyperlinks to colours adore purple, orange and pink. Even prior to this week’s update, Twitter’s accessibility panel allowed customers to enable a higher contrast mode. Nonetheless unexcited, there may be no longer any way for customers to decrease the contrast or change what font the site uses, which experts cite as a design flaw. With its first proprietary typeface Chirp, Twitter sought to “give a enhance to how we carry emotion,” nonetheless customers reported the font to be more sophisticated to read than Helvetica, which Twitter weak prior to Chirp.

According to Shawn Lawton Henry — a researcher at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, editor of the WCAG recommendations, and leader of the World Large Web Consortium’s accessibility education and outreach — websites should include customization choices for customers to toggle among fonts, contrast levels and more. WCAG doesn’t require this at present, nonetheless Henry says that future updates of the guidelines will indicate that websites give customers the possibility to change contrast.

“The main inform is that the default contrast should [meet the WCAG standards] and customers should be able to change it. It’s no longer hard, apt?” Henry said. “It’s fine to have a default font, nonetheless you have to make it customizable. Although it was the most readable font known, it would unexcited be important to allow folks to change it because of individual variations.”

When asked about adding ways for customers to change typefaces and contrast levels, a Twitter spokesperson said that the company had “no concrete plans to share apt now, nonetheless we’re always looking at ways to give a enhance to the trip and listening to feedback.”

“I think part of the disappointment here is that they’re framing this as an accessibility thing, nonetheless it’s also really clear that it was equally about building brand identity,” Haagaard said.

Whereas some customers will override website settings with USS (User Trend Sheets), Henry’s research for the World Large Web Consortium showed that person agents adore web browsers and e-e book readers should provide customers the ability to customize these settings more easily. No longer all customers are tech-savvy adequate to write USS, and it’s easier for customers to toggle among the accessibility settings particular to an app. This level of customization isn’t remarkable — in June, Discord added a saturation slider in its accessibility settings, for example.

“The beauty of the web is that it’s no longer paper, and we can change it,” Henry said.

Read More

Related Posts